From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
It's interesting to see how many people in this group and others support
the 55 MPH speed limit.

The question is, where the hell are you on the highway?!?!?!
If 55 MPH is supposed to save fuel, and the speed limit is currently 65
MPH in most places, then why, when I'm doing my usual 68-70 MPH, am I
getting my damn doors blown off?!?!?!

I guess complaining and crying is good, until it effects you...

(Of all the cars I was sharing the highway with, I passed 3 of them.
Everyone else was passing me...over 70-75 MPH)

From: Leftie on
Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
> It's interesting to see how many people in this group and others support
> the 55 MPH speed limit.
>
> The question is, where the hell are you on the highway?!?!?!
> If 55 MPH is supposed to save fuel, and the speed limit is currently 65
> MPH in most places, then why, when I'm doing my usual 68-70 MPH, am I
> getting my damn doors blown off?!?!?!
>
> I guess complaining and crying is good, until it effects you...
>
> (Of all the cars I was sharing the highway with, I passed 3 of them.
> Everyone else was passing me...over 70-75 MPH)
>


I've always supported 55, as long as you can go 60 and be left
alone. I do 58-60 in the center lane on my commute (lots of off-ramps in
the right lane) and idiots keep passing me on *both* sides. Americans
are stupid.
From: spsffan on
Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
> It's interesting to see how many people in this group and others support
> the 55 MPH speed limit.
>
> The question is, where the hell are you on the highway?!?!?!
> If 55 MPH is supposed to save fuel, and the speed limit is currently 65
> MPH in most places, then why, when I'm doing my usual 68-70 MPH, am I
> getting my damn doors blown off?!?!?!
>
> I guess complaining and crying is good, until it effects you...
>
> (Of all the cars I was sharing the highway with, I passed 3 of them.
> Everyone else was passing me...over 70-75 MPH)
>


Well I don't support 55. I put up with it for years and it is nonsense.
Sure, it saves a bit of fuel, but my time is worth a whole lot more than
that.

I'd much rather have the limit at 65 and be comfortable sticking close
to it.


DAve
From: Brent P on
On 2008-07-24, Leftie <No(a)Thanks.net> wrote:

> I've always supported 55, as long as you can go 60 and be left
> alone.

So long as the cops don't bother those driving at your chosen speed. How
absurd a standard.

> I do 58-60 in the center lane on my commute (lots of off-ramps in
> the right lane) and idiots keep passing me on *both* sides. Americans
> are stupid.

That may be true generally but in this case you're driving in the wrong
lane. Keep right except to pass. If you can't deal with the merge
impaired go fast enough so you aren't being passed on the right.



From: Leftie on
Brent P wrote:
> On 2008-07-24, Leftie <No(a)Thanks.net> wrote:
>
>> I've always supported 55, as long as you can go 60 and be left
>> alone.
>
> So long as the cops don't bother those driving at your chosen speed. How
> absurd a standard.


The standard is perfectly reasonable, and long-standing. It's to
account for both speedometer error and people momentarily drifting above
the limit. I use cruise control and know my speedometer error, so I can
set it for 60 and know I'll be going 58. You're the one being absurd.



>
>> I do 58-60 in the center lane on my commute (lots of off-ramps in
>> the right lane) and idiots keep passing me on *both* sides. Americans
>> are stupid.
>
> That may be true generally but in this case you're driving in the wrong
> lane. Keep right except to pass. If you can't deal with the merge
> impaired go fast enough so you aren't being passed on the right.
>
>
This is how we got into the current situation: being told to crowd
into the right-hand lane to make more room for speeders. On a 3 lane
highway with off-ramps on the right, the right lane should be for those
going below the limit, including those exiting or entering from ramps.
The center lane should be for cruising at the limit or so, and the left
lane for passing and emergency vehicles. This allows for the optimum
flow of traffic and for maximum safety. But that's just too sensible for
this dumbass country...