From: Cliff on 19 Jun 2010 06:45 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/17/AR2010061705859.html?hpid=topnews [ ..... The bill would require corporations, unions and nonprofit groups to disclose their top five donors if they participate in political activity and to agree to other disclosures in connection with expenditures prior to elections. The bill and a similar measure in the Senate are aimed at countering a Supreme Court ruling that unleashed unlimited political spending by corporations. The NRA had threatened to muster its formidable lobbying power against the legislation unless it was exempted from key donor disclosure requirements. ..... ]
From: edspyhill01 on 19 Jun 2010 10:28 On Jun 19, 6:45 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote: > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/17/AR201... > [ > .... > The bill would require corporations, unions and nonprofit groups to disclose > their top five donors if they participate in political activity and to agree to > other disclosures in connection with expenditures prior to elections. The bill > and a similar measure in the Senate are aimed at countering a Supreme Court > ruling that unleashed unlimited political spending by corporations. > > The NRA had threatened to muster its formidable lobbying power against the > legislation unless it was exempted from key donor disclosure requirements.. > .... > ] Do as we say, give us what we want, or we'll shoot you.
From: Shall not be infringed on 19 Jun 2010 11:54 On Jun 19, 10:28 am, edspyhill01 <edspyhil...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 19, 6:45 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> > wrote:>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/17/AR201... > > [ > > .... > > The bill would require corporations, unions and nonprofit groups to disclose > > their top five donors if they participate in political activity and to agree to > > other disclosures in connection with expenditures prior to elections. The bill > > and a similar measure in the Senate are aimed at countering a Supreme Court > > ruling that unleashed unlimited political spending by corporations. > > > The NRA had threatened to muster its formidable lobbying power against the > > legislation unless it was exempted from key donor disclosure requirements. > > .... > > ] > > Do as we say, give us what we want, or we'll shoot you. Time will tell who that quote is atributed to. $1 says it's not the NRA.
From: Cliff on 20 Jun 2010 08:36 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 08:54:20 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed <hot-ham-and-cheese(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >On Jun 19, 10:28�am, edspyhill01 <edspyhil...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Jun 19, 6:45�am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> >> wrote:>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/17/AR201... >> > [ >> > .... >> > The bill would require corporations, unions and nonprofit groups to disclose >> > their top five donors if they participate in political activity and to agree to >> > other disclosures in connection with expenditures prior to elections. The bill >> > and a similar measure in the Senate are aimed at countering a Supreme Court >> > ruling that unleashed unlimited political spending by corporations. >> >> > The NRA had threatened to muster its formidable lobbying power against the >> > legislation unless it was exempted from key donor disclosure requirements. >> > .... >> > ] >> >> Do as we say, give us what we want, or we'll shoot you. > >Time will tell who that quote is atributed to. > >$1 says it's not the NRA. They very clearly want to hide the sources of their funding. -- Cliff
From: edspyhill01 on 20 Jun 2010 09:41 On Jun 20, 8:36 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 08:54:20 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed > > > > > > <hot-ham-and-che...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >On Jun 19, 10:28 am, edspyhill01 <edspyhil...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 19, 6:45 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> > >> wrote:>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/17/AR201... > >> > [ > >> > .... > >> > The bill would require corporations, unions and nonprofit groups to disclose > >> > their top five donors if they participate in political activity and to agree to > >> > other disclosures in connection with expenditures prior to elections.. The bill > >> > and a similar measure in the Senate are aimed at countering a Supreme Court > >> > ruling that unleashed unlimited political spending by corporations. > > >> > The NRA had threatened to muster its formidable lobbying power against the > >> > legislation unless it was exempted from key donor disclosure requirements. > >> > .... > >> > ] > > >> Do as we say, give us what we want, or we'll shoot you. > > >Time will tell who that quote is atributed to. > > >$1 says it's not the NRA. > > They very clearly want to hide the sources of their funding. > -- > Cliff- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - The sources must be paramilitary groups, mainly foreign. The NRA acts like a radical political party in exile.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: {BS} Obama handles the Gulf oil crisis! Next: Sarah Palin Poetry |