Prev: What's the best MPG 4WD?
Next: 2004 Toyota Sienna AC problems and Strut problems
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 5 Aug 2007 08:56
"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly(a)my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1186285875.933483.264690(a)57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>
> www.csmonitor.com/2007/0803/p01s10-woeu.html
>

I sometimes enjoy street musicians & other performers. Why not comedians,
too? :-)


From: Mike Dobony on 6 Aug 2007 22:24

"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly(a)my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1186285875.933483.264690(a)57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>
> www.csmonitor.com/2007/0803/p01s10-woeu.html
>


Evolution is a REJECTION of science. It is totally unproven and violates
the laws of biology and physics. Every action causes a reaction and there
are no reactions without an causal action. What caused new features that
the laws of biology say can't happen? Why doesn't anybody believe that the
piano found on a mountain top just grew there? Because it is too
complicated and points to a designer. Plants and animals are way too
complicated to just be accidents. They have a design and thus a designer.

Mike D.


From: rantonrave on 6 Aug 2007 23:02

Mike Dobony wrote:
>"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly(a)my-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:1186285875.933483.264690(a)57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...

>>www.csmonitor.com/2007/0803/p01s10-woeu.html

>Evolution is a REJECTION of science. It is totally unproven and violates
>the laws of biology and physics.

Then why do most biologists and physicists believe in evolution?

From: Mike Dobony on 6 Aug 2007 23:31

<rantonrave(a)mail.com> wrote in message
news:1186455773.183164.287410(a)l70g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
> Mike Dobony wrote:
>>"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly(a)my-deja.com> wrote in message
>>news:1186285875.933483.264690(a)57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>
>>>www.csmonitor.com/2007/0803/p01s10-woeu.html
>
>>Evolution is a REJECTION of science. It is totally unproven and violates
>>the laws of biology and physics.
>
> Then why do most biologists and physicists believe in evolution?
>

No, many are turning to intelligent design. They are not believing the
Bible, but the evidence points to a designer. They are quickly following
the path that true (testable and observable) science is pointing, we are NOT
an accident or chance.


From: dh on 7 Aug 2007 01:00
"Mike Dobony" <sword(a)notasarian-host.net> wrote in message
news:RHRti.1829$rG7.32(a)nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com...
>
> <rantonrave(a)mail.com> wrote in message
> news:1186455773.183164.287410(a)l70g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Mike Dobony wrote:
>>>"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly(a)my-deja.com> wrote in message
>>>news:1186285875.933483.264690(a)57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>>>www.csmonitor.com/2007/0803/p01s10-woeu.html
>>
>>>Evolution is a REJECTION of science. It is totally unproven and violates
>>>the laws of biology and physics.
>>
>> Then why do most biologists and physicists believe in evolution?
>>
>
> No, many are turning to intelligent design. They are not believing the
> Bible, but the evidence points to a designer.

What "evidence" is that?

> They are quickly following the path that true (testable and observable)
> science is pointing, we are NOT an accident or chance.

Care to point out the hypothesis, experiment and result that confirms ID?

And we'll have no cheesy "thought experiments." Real prediction, real
confirming observation.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: What's the best MPG 4WD?
Next: 2004 Toyota Sienna AC problems and Strut problems