From: Ray O on

"C. E. White" <cewhite3(a)removemindspring.com> wrote in message
news:46029971$1(a)kcnews01...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2(a)mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:EOednWJKy5R0-WTYnZ2dnUVZ_tqnnZ2d(a)ptd.net...
>
>> The stamped part, or the steel, or the component parts, of any part that
>> is ONLY finally assembled in the US or Canada from imported components it
>> counted on the NAP label but does NOT count as US content. If the US
>> content of base materials, steel, plastics, rubber, glass, engineering ,
>> R&D, etc., fall below 70% the VIN assigned is a '4,' if it falls below
>> 40% the VIN assigned is a '5'
>
> Mike,
>
> I want to put this to bed once and for all. Last week I emailed the WMI
> co-coordinator at the SAE and asked about how WMIs are assigned. Here is
> the response:
>
> *******************************************************
>
> Prior to 1980 when WMI codes were reserved for US manufacturers (as well
> as the rest of the world), there were three possible first positions 1, 4
> or 5. So, once the "1" in the first position was depleted for available
> codes, the "4" was given to large, US manufacturers. Once the "4" was
> depleted, we began to use the "5" in the first position for large, US
> manufacturers.
>
> The only assumation for the WMI code assignment is, which large US
> manufacturer applied sooner for a WMI code than another. I randomly
> checked my database for Ford Motor Company and they have codes beginning
> with 1, 4 and 5.
>
> If you have other questions, please let me know.
>
>
> Cathy Douds
> WMI Coordinator
> SAE International
> 400 Commonwealth Drive
> Warrendale, PA 15096-0001
> 724.772.8511
> 724.776.3087 - fax
> douds(a)sae.org
>
>
>
Great job Ed!
--

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)