From: SMS on
On 22/03/10 7:48 AM, Mark wrote:
> Oh yeah - those things I see people using to buy cigarettes and beer
> and condoms and other necessary stuff... forgot about that. They
> really need to go BIG with that and make it a "comprehensive"
> program. Hope you enjoy your Soylent Green...

The Farm Bill (signed by your hero George W. Bush) renamed the program
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Alcohol, tobacco, and non-food household items cannot be purchased under
this program. Unlike in the past, where you had actual scrip to use at
the store, and it could be illegally sold, the current program uses
electronic transfers, and fraud has been greatly reduced.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on
That's right. Everyone on that program abuses it by buying booze & non-food
items. That means 100% of the people. There are none who do not abuse the
program.



"Mark" <bogusmailmark(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e3c1fdf3-5783-440e-8377-3626c9640749(a)t23g2000yqt.googlegroups.com...
Oh yeah - those things I see people using to buy cigarettes and beer
and condoms and other necessary stuff... forgot about that. They
really need to go BIG with that and make it a "comprehensive"
program. Hope you enjoy your Soylent Green...


On Mar 22, 10:14 am, SMS <scharf.ste...(a)geemail.com> wrote:
> On 22/03/10 6:27 AM, Mark wrote:
>
> > Now that we have Health Care, I can't hardly wait for Food Care
>
> It's been around for more than 40 years. It's called Supplemental
> Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), previously known as food stamps. It
> began when Nixon was president.


From: Hachiroku on
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:02:40 -0400, Obveeus wrote:

> "Conscience" <nobama@göv.com> wrote in message
> news:ho7sgt$mn0$1(a)news.albasani.net...
>> On 2010-03-22 06:44:36 -0700, "Obveeus" <Obveeus(a)aol.com> said:
>>
>>
>>> "Conscience" <nobama@göv.com> wrote:
>>>> They're already talking "Internet Care", forming a national broadband
>>>> network of 100Mb connections to 100 million homes.
>>>
>>> Wasn't it Newt Gingrich that first pushed for the government to
>>> provide a computer and internet access to every home in America?
>>
>> I don't know. Was it? And was it an unneeded 100Mb, or just basic
>> access?
>
> 100Mb wasn't really in sight 15+ years ago, but it was most definitely a
> recommendation for government subsidized computer/internet access in
> every home.

Who needs 100mb? I can see in schools, but "every home" doesn't need
internet that fast.

A shared line of 100mb, maybe. But then when your neighbors are all
watching movies on line, you'd be complaining about the speed issue.

Get DSL and be happy.