From: jcr on
SnoMan wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 10:56:50 -0400, jcr <nospam(a)nospam.com> wrote:
>
>> What are the HP & torque ratings on the Tundra?
>
>
> I seem to recall 381 HP and around 401 ft lbs of torque. It has a 32
> valve V8 with varible valve timing and it has a flat power band and
> it pulls strongly from about 2000 RPM to redline of 6 grand. It is one
> sweet motor. Quite honestly it would not need to be bigger to haul a
> 3/4 truck around because it easily out powers any gas truck engine
> made today. The only gas SUV engine made today that would be a serious
> match for it would be maybe a Ford V10.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com

Based on this, it appears that Toyota has upped the ante considerably
with the "bread-and-butter" segment of product that the US manufacturers
count on so much. When will the US catch up?! <sigh>
From: SnoMan on
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:13:30 -0400, jcr <nospam(a)nospam.com> wrote:

>Based on this, it appears that Toyota has upped the ante considerably
>with the "bread-and-butter" segment of product that the US manufacturers
>count on so much. When will the US catch up?! <sigh>

It gets better. Rumor has it that when Toyota rolls out 3/4 and one
ton models they will offer the option of a CAT diesel. Not because
they cannot build a good motor themselves but because to penetrate
that niche market they can improve their odds with a US designed and
made diesel engine with a excellant reputation too. I cannot reveal my
source for this but I do beleive it to be fairly creditable and it
also makes a lot of sense too. Give how US trucks are made for a lot
of parts made in mexico, a Toyota truck built in US with a CAT could
be a nightmare for detriots diesel P/U sales.


From: Kevin on
There's a pile of problems with the pumps and drivers on those engines. 3
pump revisions later, we're still changing a pile of parts.

LLY and LBZ engines are solid if you keep clean fuel filters on them. If you
don't, you're buying injectors, and they're kinds pricey!


"PerfectReign" <perfectreign(a)xr4ti.cotse.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.03.31.18.11.07(a)xr4ti.cotse.net...
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 11:31:32 -0500, a rock fell the sky, hitting Kevin on
> the head, and inspiring the following:
>
>> You want an electronic 6.5 TD???? Better get a box of FSDs and a couple
>> injection pumps in the deal. Best 6.5 is mechanical TD, about 94.
>>
>
> Really?
>
> I've been reading that there were issues with the '96 model injectors and
> some cooling issues with the block but that by '98/'99 they'd all been
> worked out.
>
> Right now, I'm just browsing and would love an LLY or an LBZ but I know
> they didn't do such things and have no intention of a major swap. Besides
> I like the < 2000 body style.
>
> --
> k


From: PerfectReign on
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 23:43:26 +0000, a rock fell the sky, hitting SnoMan on
the head, and inspiring the following:

> On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:13:30 -0400, jcr <nospam(a)nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>Based on this, it appears that Toyota has upped the ante considerably
>>with the "bread-and-butter" segment of product that the US manufacturers
>>count on so much. When will the US catch up?! <sigh>
>
> It gets better. Rumor has it that when Toyota rolls out 3/4 and one ton
> models they will offer the option of a CAT diesel.

That's what I've been reading, too.

> Not because they
> cannot build a good motor themselves but because to penetrate that niche
> market they can improve their odds with a US designed and made diesel
> engine with a excellant reputation too.

Who *does* build their own? Ford uses Navistar IIRC, Dodge uses Cummins
and GM uses Duramax, which was a joint venture with Joe Izusu.

> I cannot reveal my source for
> this

I read it in Diesel Power and I think in Truck Trend.

>but I do beleive it to be fairly creditable and it also makes a lot
> of sense too. Give how US trucks are made for a lot of parts made in
> mexico, a Toyota truck built in US with a CAT could be a nightmare for
> detriots diesel P/U sales.

--
k
From: PerfectReign on
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 18:45:54 -0500, a rock fell the sky, hitting Kevin on
the head, and inspiring the following:

> There's a pile of problems with the pumps and drivers on those engines.
> 3 pump revisions later, we're still changing a pile of parts.

You referring to the 6.5? I thought they were fairly rock solid.

>
> LLY and LBZ engines are solid if you keep clean fuel filters on them. If
> you don't, you're buying injectors, and they're kinds pricey!

Yeah, been there / done that! (I had a '95 Jimmy with the SFI 4.3
Vortec.)

--
k