From: Cliff on
On 11 Apr 2010 09:01:01 -0500, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbrown(a)nowhere.com> wrote:

>He is a patriot right up there with George Washington, Thomas Jefferson,
>
>Ben Franklin and the other fearless founders of our country.

Any of which would puke on him.
--
Cliff
From: Cliff on
On 11 Apr 2010 09:01:01 -0500, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbrown(a)nowhere.com> wrote:

>Men who spoke out against tyranny and fought for freedom.

By evading the draft while doing coke?
--
Cliff
From: Army Of The 13th Monkey on
On 4/12/2010 4:06 PM, Cliff wrote:
> On 11 Apr 2010 09:01:01 -0500, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbrown(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> Glenn Beck
>>
>> 3 Million plus viewers for his nightly TV show
>
> DANG !!
> I thought it was higher.
> After all, the US has at least 100 million with IQs well under 100.


Those 100 million Liberals are too busy licking windows at 5:00pm to
watch.... Later they have Lead paint flavored KOOL-ADE.
From: Beam Me Up Scotty on
On 4/12/2010 4:06 PM, Cliff wrote:
> On 11 Apr 2010 09:01:01 -0500, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbrown(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> Glenn Beck
>>
>> 3 Million plus viewers for his nightly TV show
>
> DANG !!
> I thought it was higher.
> After all, the US has at least 100 million with IQs well under 100.


Thinking again and you got yourself in trouble again.
From: Aratzio on
On 12 Apr 2010 08:41:02 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks, "Fred
B. Brown" <fredbbrown(a)nowhere.com> got double secret probation for
writing:

>
>"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>news:r114s55at2h1hoepnq8806jio4177aaqfi(a)4ax.com...
>> On 11 Apr 2010 09:01:01 -0500, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, "Fred
>> B. Brown" <fredbbrown(a)nowhere.com> got double secret probation for
>> writing:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>You are confusing Glenn Beck with Barack Obama. Obama is the one trying
>>>to destroy our Constitutional Republic.
>>>It's an undisputed fact that the Obama administration is staffed with
>>>Communists.
>>
>> I dispute that. Now you are lying.
>
>Undisputed communists. Out of their own mouths.
>Prove otherwise.

I don't have to, your claim is that it is "undisputed". My disputing
oit proves you are wrong.

>
>>>It's an undisputed fact that Barack Obama is a Marxist, he's said so out
>>>of
>>>his own mouth on video.
>>
>> I dispute that too.
>
>Good for you. Prove otherwise.
>His father was a communist, went to Africa to start a revolution.
>His mother was a communist, abandoned him.
>His Grandparents were Marxists.
>He surrounded himself with Marxist professors and students in college.
>He has communists on his staff in the White House.


So, you don't even understand the English that you use. If perchance I
dispute your statement it is no longer undisputed. Now if you actually
meant that in your opinion there is indisputable evidence that might
not be the case. But you have stated an absolute and those are made by
idiots.

Now that we have you idiocy confirmed, you just made lot of claims,
it is your responsibility to provide "undisputed" proof that your
claims are factual and mot the fevered imagination of a lunatic.

It is not the job of the reader to prove or disprove your hilarious
claims. You make the claim, you provide the proof to support the
claim.

You won't, you are too much of a single source person and anything
that is actual proof will elude you.



>
>>>The attacks on Beck by the Progressives give credability to Beck's
>>>exposing
>>>their agenda. They are desperate to silence him, especially since the
>>>Courts
>>>struck down their plan to establish "Net Neutrality" and give the
>>>government
>>>control of the Internet and radio and TV broadcasting.
>>
>> Umm, cupcake, you don't know what is "net neutrality" do you. And the
>> FCC already "controls" TV and Radio.
>
>I do understand "net neutrality" and the FCC wants to expand control of
>radio and TV and establish control of the Internet.

No. Net Neutrality is that no packet is given priority over any other
packet. The network is neutral to the traffic.

If you maybe could look at the phrase and its definition you would
have known that.

>It wants to shut down conservative stations and replace them with government
>friendly liberal stations. It also wants to be able to regulate the Internet
>so it can shut down web sites, bloggers, newsgroups and anyone opposed to the
>government.

Really, I LOVE paranoid delusions. Please feel free to describe the
methodology that the FCC will be using to decide which stations are
going to be banned?

Please clue us all in, I am sure that you have all the facts right at
your fingertips, right?

You can explain how something like that will escape the Supreme Court
and Congress?

Unless they are in on the conspiracy too?

OMG, YOU ARE RIGHT WE ARE ALL DOOOMED!!!!
SCALIA AND THOMAS ARE COMMIE PLANTS!!!!!

It is either that or you and Beck are just lunatics,

AFN: Grezvangr jvgu cerwhqvpr, ur xabjf gbb zhpu.



--

Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues:

Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org>

I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against
his knees...