From: Mike Hunter on 16 Mar 2007 14:30 If that were true, as you choose to believe, why does Toyota not have just a 4, rather than a 4 and 5. On the other hand Nissan, who started to assemble cars and trucks in the US of US parts rather than imported part many years after Toyota, have a '1' as the first number of the VIN on the Titan and Altima, and not a 4 or 5 ? ;) mike "Jeff" <news(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message news:wphKh.11261$Hb6.861(a)trndny03... > .. Originally, the US was > assigned just '1's. Then they ran out. > Jeff
From: Ed White on 16 Mar 2007 16:27 On Mar 16, 2:30 pm, "Mike Hunter" <mikehu...(a)mailcity.com> wrote: > If that were true, as you choose to believe, why does Toyota not have just a > 4, rather than a 4 and 5. On the other hand Nissan, who started to assemble > cars and trucks in the US of US parts rather than imported part many years > after Toyota, have a '1' as the first number of the VIN on the Titan and > Altima, and not a 4 or 5 ? ;) > > mike I have no idea why Toyota has allocated the WMIs the way they have done it. Can you explain why does Ford uses 1, 4, and 5 in the first position of the VIN? Why does a Ford Explorer use a 1 as the first digit and a Mercury Mountaineer use a 4? Why does a Ford Expedition use a 1 as the first digit and a Lincoln Navigator use a 5? Why does a Ford Escape use a 1 as the first digit and a Mercury Marier use a 4? Why do all Mustangs have a 1 as the first digit, when V-6 Automatic Mustangs don't have enough domestic content to qualify as a domestic car? Why don't you provide one verifiable reference that confirms your speculation that the WMI is related to domestic content? Ed
From: Mike Hunter on 16 Mar 2007 18:37 I notice you did not answer why Nissan has a '1' on their cars and trucks, yet came to the US long after Toyota, but want me to answer . Those Ford products that have and '4' and '5' do not have enough US content to warrant a '1' The interiors, grills, and many other lower volume parts are made in Canada, for the other versions of the Ford models, and do not count as US content. The problem is you are confusing the NAP label with US content. The Mustangs in total have enough US content to warrant a '1.' The R&D, engineering, steel, rubber, glass, plastics, electronic etc all originated in the US, for one. I've told you guys a dozen time to search the US Commerce Department for the information you seek. That is what I did I after I contacted some of the people I knew at my former employer and they did not even know. mike "Ed White" <ce.white3(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:1174076871.216174.284800(a)l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > On Mar 16, 2:30 pm, "Mike Hunter" <mikehu...(a)mailcity.com> wrote: >> If that were true, as you choose to believe, why does Toyota not have >> just a >> 4, rather than a 4 and 5. On the other hand Nissan, who started to >> assemble >> cars and trucks in the US of US parts rather than imported part many >> years >> after Toyota, have a '1' as the first number of the VIN on the Titan and >> Altima, and not a 4 or 5 ? ;) >> >> mike > > I have no idea why Toyota has allocated the WMIs the way they have > done it. Can you explain why does Ford uses 1, 4, and 5 in the first > position of the VIN? > > Ed >
From: Jeff on 16 Mar 2007 21:29 "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2(a)mailcity.com> wrote in message news:ldednR99RLYQf2fYnZ2dnUVZ_hqdnZ2d(a)ptd.net... > If that were true, as you choose to believe, why does Toyota not have just > a 4, rather than a 4 and 5. On the other hand Nissan, who started to > assemble cars and trucks in the US of US parts rather than imported part > many years after Toyota, have a '1' as the first number of the VIN on the > Titan and Altima, and not a 4 or 5 ? ;) > > mike > > > "Jeff" <news(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message > news:wphKh.11261$Hb6.861(a)trndny03... >> > . Originally, the US was >> assigned just '1's. Then they ran out. >> Jeff Mike, it is a matter of belief. It is a matter of evidence. And right now, there is a lot of evidence that contradicts your conjecture and none to support it. How about supporting it with a URL? You said you have one. So just post it, and show I am wrong. Jeff
From: Jeff on 16 Mar 2007 21:42 "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2(a)mailcity.com> wrote in message news:n9edncjvVqntgWbYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d(a)ptd.net... >I notice you did not answer why Nissan has a '1' on their cars and trucks, >yet came to the US long after Toyota, but want me to answer . Those Ford >products that have and '4' and '5' do not have enough US content to >warrant a '1' The interiors, grills, and many other lower volume parts are >made in Canada, for the other versions of the Ford models, and do not count >as US content. > > The problem is you are confusing the NAP label with US content. The > Mustangs in total have enough US content to warrant a '1.' The R&D, > engineering, steel, rubber, glass, plastics, electronic etc all originated > in the US, for one. I've told you guys a dozen time to search the US > Commerce Department for the information you seek. That is what I did I > after I contacted some of the people I knew at my former employer and they > did not even know. > > > mike > > > "Ed White" <ce.white3(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:1174076871.216174.284800(a)l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com... >> On Mar 16, 2:30 pm, "Mike Hunter" <mikehu...(a)mailcity.com> wrote: >>> If that were true, as you choose to believe, why does Toyota not have >>> just a >>> 4, rather than a 4 and 5. On the other hand Nissan, who started to >>> assemble >>> cars and trucks in the US of US parts rather than imported part many >>> years >>> after Toyota, have a '1' as the first number of the VIN on the Titan and >>> Altima, and not a 4 or 5 ? ;) >>> >>> mike >> >> I have no idea why Toyota has allocated the WMIs the way they have >> done it. Can you explain why does Ford uses 1, 4, and 5 in the first >> position of the VIN? >> >> Ed Because the SAE assigned Nissan a '1'. Why don't you ask them? If you search the SAE site, you can find the names of a few people who are responsible for the VIN numberings system. You said that parts made in Canada don't count as US content for the VIN system. How about proving this? What is the URL of the site that describes how the 1, 4, and 5 are assigned? How about evidence that is independent of the VIN system that demonstrates that Ford gets more parts all Mercury SUVs from Canada, and even more all Lincolns? Notice I said all. All Mercury SUVs get a '4' and all LIncoln SUVs and Trucks get a '5'. You said that R&D and engineer count. Were the Navigators engineered in Canada? How about the R&D? Was that different for the LIncolns than the Fords? I would think all the R&D was near Canada, just west of Detroit. But last I checked, Michigan was still part of the US. You said you contacted a few people you know from your old job, and they did not know. Aren't they the people who claim told you this nonsense in the beginning? Aren't they the people you said sent you the URL in the first place? So what you're saying is that you have absolutely no proof for this. And this system is mandated by someone (Commerce Depart?), yet there is no evidence of this on any newstory, any commerce department website, and no vehicle manufacturer. Yet, all the first digits of each vehicle type (car, truck, SUV, truck - chasis only, etc.) seems to be set for each make? I mean, I haven't seen any Fords that begin 5F* or 4F*, they all begin 1F*. Wouldn't you think there was some variation? I mean Ford gets a lot of its parts for its Mustang from Mexico. And some parts from Canada, most likely. Don't you think at least some Mustangs or Fusions, Foci, or whatever would get a 4? And don't you think it is odd that Mercury and Lincoln use enough content to get a 1 for their cars, but Mercury gets a 4 for their trucks? And Mazda too? And Lincoln gets a 5? Why do you think that Mercury and Lincoln build their parts in Canada while Ford doesn't? And do you have any independent evidence that they do? Get a clue man.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prev: new shocks/struts - when? Next: feeling dissapointmed with Boch Toyota, Norwood MA |