Does BO ever tell the truth?
in [Toyota]
|
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 18 Jul 2010 23:50 On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:31:17 -0400, homey wrote: > On 7/17/2010 1:07 PM, Mike Hunter wrote: >> Seem BO(ZO) had lied to us AGAIN. The new so called healthcare reform act >> will pay for any abortion that is currently legal in the various states. >> The plan being implemented in Pennsylvania and several other states, says >> exactly that. >> >> >> > Missed another period, Mike? Nah. This time all his sentances end with periods.
From: Jeff Strickland on 19 Jul 2010 10:54 "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:WXP0o.37694$YX3.12830(a)newsfe18.iad... > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:31:17 -0400, homey wrote: > >> On 7/17/2010 1:07 PM, Mike Hunter wrote: >>> Seem BO(ZO) had lied to us AGAIN. The new so called healthcare reform >>> act >>> will pay for any abortion that is currently legal in the various states. >>> The plan being implemented in Pennsylvania and several other states, >>> says >>> exactly that. >>> >>> >>> >> Missed another period, Mike? > > Nah. This time all his sentances end with periods. > That's what I was gonna say, all the periods appear to be there, and in the proper places. OH! Now I get it, abortion -- missed period. Funny stuff. Not. Why do liberals think public money should be used to get an abortion. Why do they think MY money should be available for their girlfriend/hook-up to get an abortion? I get that they might want the hook-up to abort, but they ought to use their own money.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 19 Jul 2010 11:04 "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:i21p1i$hh8$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:WXP0o.37694$YX3.12830(a)newsfe18.iad... >> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:31:17 -0400, homey wrote: >> >>> On 7/17/2010 1:07 PM, Mike Hunter wrote: >>>> Seem BO(ZO) had lied to us AGAIN. The new so called healthcare reform >>>> act >>>> will pay for any abortion that is currently legal in the various >>>> states. >>>> The plan being implemented in Pennsylvania and several other states, >>>> says >>>> exactly that. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Missed another period, Mike? >> >> Nah. This time all his sentances end with periods. >> > > That's what I was gonna say, all the periods appear to be there, and in > the proper places. > > OH! Now I get it, abortion -- missed period. Funny stuff. Not. > > Why do liberals think public money should be used to get an abortion. Why > do they think MY money should be available for their girlfriend/hook-up to > get an abortion? I get that they might want the hook-up to abort, but they > ought to use their own money. Should public money be used for ANY self-inflicted medical condition? There are many such conditions besides recreational pregnancy.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 19 Jul 2010 17:46 "dbu," <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message news:vZmdnXWHkM7wJtnRnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > In article <%PZ0o.40934$Ls1.15045(a)newsfe11.iad>, > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote: > >> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:i21p1i$hh8$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> > >> > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> > news:WXP0o.37694$YX3.12830(a)newsfe18.iad... >> >> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:31:17 -0400, homey wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 7/17/2010 1:07 PM, Mike Hunter wrote: >> >>>> Seem BO(ZO) had lied to us AGAIN. The new so called healthcare >> >>>> reform >> >>>> act >> >>>> will pay for any abortion that is currently legal in the various >> >>>> states. >> >>>> The plan being implemented in Pennsylvania and several other states, >> >>>> says >> >>>> exactly that. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> Missed another period, Mike? >> >> >> >> Nah. This time all his sentances end with periods. >> >> >> > >> > That's what I was gonna say, all the periods appear to be there, and in >> > the proper places. >> > >> > OH! Now I get it, abortion -- missed period. Funny stuff. Not. >> > >> > Why do liberals think public money should be used to get an abortion. >> > Why >> > do they think MY money should be available for their girlfriend/hook-up >> > to >> > get an abortion? I get that they might want the hook-up to abort, but >> > they >> > ought to use their own money. >> >> >> Should public money be used for ANY self-inflicted medical condition? >> There >> are many such conditions besides recreational pregnancy. > > The twit always asks the questions, but never answers any. My advise is > to ignore the twit. The twit has no backbone and cannot afford to stick > his thin little neck out. One day, maybe you'll ask a sensible question and I will answer it, "watchmaker".
From: Jeff Strickland on 19 Jul 2010 17:51
"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:%PZ0o.40934$Ls1.15045(a)newsfe11.iad... > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:i21p1i$hh8$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> news:WXP0o.37694$YX3.12830(a)newsfe18.iad... >>> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:31:17 -0400, homey wrote: >>> >>>> On 7/17/2010 1:07 PM, Mike Hunter wrote: >>>>> Seem BO(ZO) had lied to us AGAIN. The new so called healthcare reform >>>>> act >>>>> will pay for any abortion that is currently legal in the various >>>>> states. >>>>> The plan being implemented in Pennsylvania and several other states, >>>>> says >>>>> exactly that. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Missed another period, Mike? >>> >>> Nah. This time all his sentances end with periods. >>> >> >> That's what I was gonna say, all the periods appear to be there, and in >> the proper places. >> >> OH! Now I get it, abortion -- missed period. Funny stuff. Not. >> >> Why do liberals think public money should be used to get an abortion. Why >> do they think MY money should be available for their girlfriend/hook-up >> to get an abortion? I get that they might want the hook-up to abort, but >> they ought to use their own money. > > > Should public money be used for ANY self-inflicted medical condition? > There are many such conditions besides recreational pregnancy. > Basically, no. Public money should not cover self inflicted stupidity. I suppose that rule isn't hard and fast, but without specific exclusions to discuss, it holds up pretty well. But, your question is beside the point and has very little relevence, if any. |