Bush dropped the ball AGAIN
in [Toyota]
|
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 10 Nov 2009 10:46 "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hdc1nf$pvt$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message > news:3T4Km.12405$ZF3.823(a)newsfe13.iad... >> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:hdalj6$403$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> >>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:hdale7$2l7$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>> >>>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >>>> news:cd4Km.12398$ZF3.5324(a)newsfe13.iad... >>>>> Obviously not true, but I'm using the same logic as the sot in >>>>> Florida, just for recreational purposes. >>>>> >>>>> U.S. Monitored Fort Hood Suspect Before Shooting >>>>> >>>>> By DAVID JOHNSTON and SCOTT SHANE >>>>> Published: November 9, 2009 >>>>> WASHINGTON -- Intelligence agencies intercepted communications last >>>>> year and earlier this year between Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, who is >>>>> accused of shooting to death 13 people at Fort Hood, Tex., and a >>>>> radical cleric in Yemen known for his incendiary anti-American >>>>> teachings. But federal authorities dropped an inquiry into the matter >>>>> after deciding the messages warranted no further action, government >>>>> officials said on Monday. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Note the words "last year". Bush was in office, therefore he condoned >>>>> the murders at Fort Hood. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/us/10inquire.html?pagewanted=1&hp >>>>> >>>>> Bush supported a terrorist who murdered our soldiers right here on >>>>> American soil. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Let me get this straight. You and the rest of the Liberal Left complain >>>> bitterly for 8 years that Bush/Cheney shredded the Constitution through >>>> the Patriot Act, and NOW you complain bitterly that he did not enforce >>>> the Patriot Act against a US Army major? >>>> >>>> How does that work, exactly? >>>> >>>> The Patriot Act is illegal, you cried. Rights are being voilated, you >>>> screamed. >>>> >>>> Now you want to impose an illegal act and violate rights because a >>>> whack job was expressing his 1st Amendment rights? >>>> >>>> How do you sleep at night with so much conflict in your life? >>>> Seriously! You pitch a fit about taking your shoes off at the airport, >>>> but turn around and complain that nobody did anything to prevent 9/11. >>>> Some of you even believe that 9/11 was an inside job, but complain that >>>> it was not stopped. You complain that the government is spying on >>>> everybody, then turn around and complain that they did not spy on >>>> everybody. >>>> >>>> You really need to pick one argument or the other, and stick with it. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> BY THE WAY >>> I get that you're postulating a hypothetical story. I'm postulating a >>> hypothetical response. >> >> >> The news story is REAL. My comical conclusion was a 100% accurate parody >> of the idiot in Florida, who thinks presidents know what kind of window >> cleaner is used at FBI headquarters. >> > > So, you admit that the illegal Patriot Act should be used to prevent > attacks? Illegal? Please explain.
From: Jeff Strickland on 10 Nov 2009 11:08 "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:4VfKm.9989$%j4.243(a)newsfe18.iad... > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:hdc1nf$pvt$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >> news:3T4Km.12405$ZF3.823(a)newsfe13.iad... >>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:hdalj6$403$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>> >>>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> news:hdale7$2l7$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>>> >>>>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:cd4Km.12398$ZF3.5324(a)newsfe13.iad... >>>>>> Obviously not true, but I'm using the same logic as the sot in >>>>>> Florida, just for recreational purposes. >>>>>> >>>>>> U.S. Monitored Fort Hood Suspect Before Shooting >>>>>> >>>>>> By DAVID JOHNSTON and SCOTT SHANE >>>>>> Published: November 9, 2009 >>>>>> WASHINGTON -- Intelligence agencies intercepted communications last >>>>>> year and earlier this year between Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, who is >>>>>> accused of shooting to death 13 people at Fort Hood, Tex., and a >>>>>> radical cleric in Yemen known for his incendiary anti-American >>>>>> teachings. But federal authorities dropped an inquiry into the matter >>>>>> after deciding the messages warranted no further action, government >>>>>> officials said on Monday. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Note the words "last year". Bush was in office, therefore he condoned >>>>>> the murders at Fort Hood. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/us/10inquire.html?pagewanted=1&hp >>>>>> >>>>>> Bush supported a terrorist who murdered our soldiers right here on >>>>>> American soil. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Let me get this straight. You and the rest of the Liberal Left >>>>> complain bitterly for 8 years that Bush/Cheney shredded the >>>>> Constitution through the Patriot Act, and NOW you complain bitterly >>>>> that he did not enforce the Patriot Act against a US Army major? >>>>> >>>>> How does that work, exactly? >>>>> >>>>> The Patriot Act is illegal, you cried. Rights are being voilated, you >>>>> screamed. >>>>> >>>>> Now you want to impose an illegal act and violate rights because a >>>>> whack job was expressing his 1st Amendment rights? >>>>> >>>>> How do you sleep at night with so much conflict in your life? >>>>> Seriously! You pitch a fit about taking your shoes off at the airport, >>>>> but turn around and complain that nobody did anything to prevent 9/11. >>>>> Some of you even believe that 9/11 was an inside job, but complain >>>>> that it was not stopped. You complain that the government is spying on >>>>> everybody, then turn around and complain that they did not spy on >>>>> everybody. >>>>> >>>>> You really need to pick one argument or the other, and stick with it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> BY THE WAY >>>> I get that you're postulating a hypothetical story. I'm postulating a >>>> hypothetical response. >>> >>> >>> The news story is REAL. My comical conclusion was a 100% accurate parody >>> of the idiot in Florida, who thinks presidents know what kind of window >>> cleaner is used at FBI headquarters. >>> >> >> So, you admit that the illegal Patriot Act should be used to prevent >> attacks? > > > Illegal? Please explain. > Me explain? You're the one that complains the Patriot Act is illegal. You explain.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 10 Nov 2009 11:10 "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hdc35s$7ph$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message > news:4VfKm.9989$%j4.243(a)newsfe18.iad... >> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:hdc1nf$pvt$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> >>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >>> news:3T4Km.12405$ZF3.823(a)newsfe13.iad... >>>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> news:hdalj6$403$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>>> >>>>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:hdale7$2l7$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>> >>>>>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >>>>>> news:cd4Km.12398$ZF3.5324(a)newsfe13.iad... >>>>>>> Obviously not true, but I'm using the same logic as the sot in >>>>>>> Florida, just for recreational purposes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> U.S. Monitored Fort Hood Suspect Before Shooting >>>>>>> >>>>>>> By DAVID JOHNSTON and SCOTT SHANE >>>>>>> Published: November 9, 2009 >>>>>>> WASHINGTON -- Intelligence agencies intercepted communications last >>>>>>> year and earlier this year between Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, who is >>>>>>> accused of shooting to death 13 people at Fort Hood, Tex., and a >>>>>>> radical cleric in Yemen known for his incendiary anti-American >>>>>>> teachings. But federal authorities dropped an inquiry into the >>>>>>> matter after deciding the messages warranted no further action, >>>>>>> government officials said on Monday. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Note the words "last year". Bush was in office, therefore he >>>>>>> condoned the murders at Fort Hood. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/us/10inquire.html?pagewanted=1&hp >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bush supported a terrorist who murdered our soldiers right here on >>>>>>> American soil. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me get this straight. You and the rest of the Liberal Left >>>>>> complain bitterly for 8 years that Bush/Cheney shredded the >>>>>> Constitution through the Patriot Act, and NOW you complain bitterly >>>>>> that he did not enforce the Patriot Act against a US Army major? >>>>>> >>>>>> How does that work, exactly? >>>>>> >>>>>> The Patriot Act is illegal, you cried. Rights are being voilated, you >>>>>> screamed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now you want to impose an illegal act and violate rights because a >>>>>> whack job was expressing his 1st Amendment rights? >>>>>> >>>>>> How do you sleep at night with so much conflict in your life? >>>>>> Seriously! You pitch a fit about taking your shoes off at the >>>>>> airport, but turn around and complain that nobody did anything to >>>>>> prevent 9/11. Some of you even believe that 9/11 was an inside job, >>>>>> but complain that it was not stopped. You complain that the >>>>>> government is spying on everybody, then turn around and complain that >>>>>> they did not spy on everybody. >>>>>> >>>>>> You really need to pick one argument or the other, and stick with it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> BY THE WAY >>>>> I get that you're postulating a hypothetical story. I'm postulating a >>>>> hypothetical response. >>>> >>>> >>>> The news story is REAL. My comical conclusion was a 100% accurate >>>> parody of the idiot in Florida, who thinks presidents know what kind of >>>> window cleaner is used at FBI headquarters. >>>> >>> >>> So, you admit that the illegal Patriot Act should be used to prevent >>> attacks? >> >> >> Illegal? Please explain. >> > > Me explain? You're the one that complains the Patriot Act is illegal. You > explain. I never said it was illegal. Please tell your doctor to review your medications before you hurt yourself or someone else.
From: Gary L. Burnore on 11 Nov 2009 22:48 On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:07:43 -0800, "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >news:cd4Km.12398$ZF3.5324(a)newsfe13.iad... >> Obviously not true, but I'm using the same logic as the sot in Florida, >> just for recreational purposes. >> >> U.S. Monitored Fort Hood Suspect Before Shooting >> >> By DAVID JOHNSTON and SCOTT SHANE >> Published: November 9, 2009 >> WASHINGTON -- Intelligence agencies intercepted communications last year >> and earlier this year between Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, who is accused of >> shooting to death 13 people at Fort Hood, Tex., and a radical cleric in >> Yemen known for his incendiary anti-American teachings. But federal >> authorities dropped an inquiry into the matter after deciding the messages >> warranted no further action, government officials said on Monday. >> >> >> >> Note the words "last year". Bush was in office, therefore he condoned the >> murders at Fort Hood. >> >> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/us/10inquire.html?pagewanted=1&hp >> >> Bush supported a terrorist who murdered our soldiers right here on >> American soil. >> >> > >Let me get this straight. You and the rest of the Liberal Left complain >bitterly for 8 years that Bush/Cheney shredded the Constitution through the >Patriot Act, and NOW you complain bitterly that he did not enforce the >Patriot Act against a US Army major? They're just using republican logic. Don't ya hate that now?
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Sorta ot...went to get my 'new' van today... Next: Glass Break Detector |