{BS} Still nowhere near the flood of 1936
in [Toyota]
|
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 31 Mar 2010 17:38 A lot of areas in the Northeast are reporting record water levels, but it is still not near the flood of 1936 that went from New England to the middle Atlantic states. No comfort to those flooded out, I'm sure...
From: Mike Hunter on 31 Mar 2010 20:20 Don't know, but lots of the records from the mid thirties are the highest on record. The Governor of RI said the water level there are the highest ever recorded, The storm was a 500 year storm event, according to Dr Joe Stoble at Acuweather out of Penn State.. "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:pan.2010.03.31.21.38.34.49975(a)e86.GTS... >A lot of areas in the Northeast are reporting record water levels, but it > is still not near the flood of 1936 that went from New England to the > middle Atlantic states. > > No comfort to those flooded out, I'm sure... >
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 31 Mar 2010 20:30 On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:20:29 -0400, Mike Hunter wrote: > Don't know, but lots of the records from the mid thirties are the highest on > record. The Governor of RI said the water level there are the highest > ever recorded, The storm was a 500 year storm event, according to Dr Joe > Stoble at Acuweather out of Penn State.. we'll have to se the aftermath. Some places are recording record levels, but it doesn't appear to be as widespread as 1936. > > > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:pan.2010.03.31.21.38.34.49975(a)e86.GTS... >>A lot of areas in the Northeast are reporting record water levels, but it >> is still not near the flood of 1936 that went from New England to the >> middle Atlantic states. >> >> No comfort to those flooded out, I'm sure... >>
|
Pages: 1 Prev: More sad days ahead for America Next: Is Obama the anti-CHRIST? |