From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/11/obama-money-sarah-palin-going-rogue-book.html

You can't make this stuff up!


From: ByTor on
In article <foqng5ph5eplj7spb8el7j6gncvac9cntm(a)4ax.com>,
MoveOn(a)outa.here says...
>
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:14:22 -0500, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
> wrote:
>
> >http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/11/obama-money-sarah-palin-going-rogue-book.html
> >
> >You can't make this stuff up!
> >
>
> Bambi is in deep trouble and the deep is named Sarah...

I'm all for the pressure she seems to exert with all the reactions she
gets from both the left media & the left in power, they're afraid she
will take *votes* away from them. The media, well she makes good news
for them........I love when she answered the question about Letterman &
appearing on his show if given the chance, she said she will not help
him boost his ratings, which in fact is what would happen......look what
happened with the Oprah show......I admire her for that because can you
imagine what her payday would be on that?.......;0)

> Can you imagine his ego when Sarah beats him with a landslide????

Forget Obama, could you imagine how Hillary Clinton would feel? Honestly
I'd be a bit more comfortable with Hillary in office, not much, but a
little more comfortable.

> Can you imagine how great the country will be with her at the helm????

But, while I like the fact that she keeps them off balance I'm sort of
putting her in the same category as Obama, *popular* but yet seriously
*inexperienced*. I honestly don't think I would be comfortable with her
in a high position of power. Yes she got a raw deal during the campaigns
& I feel totally treated with disrespect far more than I have ever seen
any other candidate treated but her *victim* routine is not enough for
me to ever consider her for a high position of power. She has three
things in common with Obama; Inexperienced, popularity, and she would
have the goal at being the *first* woman president as Obama is the first
black president. All three are NOT qualifications to be president.

Bottom line, unless she *TOTALLY* suprises me with some sort of newfound
brilliance (I'm not saying she's stupid) I would not vote for her.


From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:35:49 -0500, ByTor wrote:

>> Can you imagine his ego when Sarah beats him with a landslide????
>
> Forget Obama, could you imagine how Hillary Clinton would feel? Honestly
> I'd be a bit more comfortable with Hillary in office, not much, but a
> little more comfortable.

I'm almost beginning to feel that way myself, but then, she didn't do a
great job the first time...



From: ByTor on
In article <pan.2009.11.24.14.44.44.708578(a)e86.GTS>, Trueno(a)e86.GTS
says...
>
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:35:49 -0500, ByTor wrote:
>
> >> Can you imagine his ego when Sarah beats him with a landslide????
> >
> > Forget Obama, could you imagine how Hillary Clinton would feel? Honestly
> > I'd be a bit more comfortable with Hillary in office, not much, but a
> > little more comfortable.
>
> I'm almost beginning to feel that way myself, but then, she didn't do a
> great job the first time...

Agreed.......But her *victim* routine can only go so far as well
(standing by her man). She was also check mated by accepting her current
position, I thought she was smarter than that or she has just given up
on future aspirations for president and takes what she can get. The
hypocrisy of the campaigns & than smooching up to Obama was redicolous &
transparent, she kinda lost me there a little by not standing firm to
her principles.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on
"ByTor" <ByTor(a)snowdog.com> wrote in message
news:00c5070c$0$6707$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
> In article <foqng5ph5eplj7spb8el7j6gncvac9cntm(a)4ax.com>,
> MoveOn(a)outa.here says...
>>
> But, while I like the fact that she keeps them off balance I'm sort of
> putting her in the same category as Obama, *popular* but yet seriously
> *inexperienced*. I honestly don't think I would be comfortable with her
> in a high position of power. Yes she got a raw deal during the campaigns
> & I feel totally treated with disrespect far more than I have ever seen
> any other candidate treated but her *victim* routine is not enough for
> me to ever consider her for a high position of power. She has three
> things in common with Obama; Inexperienced, popularity, and she would
> have the goal at being the *first* woman president as Obama is the first
> black president. All three are NOT qualifications to be president.
>
> Bottom line, unless she *TOTALLY* suprises me with some sort of newfound
> brilliance (I'm not saying she's stupid) I would not vote for her.


I spoke last week with an 88 year old neighbor who went on one of those
honor flights to Washington ( http://www.honorflight.org/ ). McCain met
briefly with his group. The neighbor said McCain seemed pretty frail. After
a pause, he said it was pretty scary to think of who his running mate was.
He said he was a Republican, he'd voted the party line for years, but if the
party propped her to run in the next election, it would be the last time he
voted Republican.