{BS} Movement afoot to drop "anchor babies"
in [Toyota]
|
From: Clive on 1 Aug 2010 05:11 In message <4c54ecf2$0$74748$afc38c87(a)read01.usenet4all.se>, =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> writes >Hmmmmm..... >> It transpired that she was passed the date where she >> should fly and the Customs were aware of your clause 14 so they had a >> word with the American Embassy who requested that she didn't proceed. >> She was turned around and put on a flight back home. >You didn't want her either? Where was she from? ;) I must have been somewhere foreign. Inside the EU there is no restriction, everyone else needs at least a visa. Entry regulations are strict, if illegals are caught hiding in lorries coming from France the are deported and the lorry driver can be fined up to �2000 per illegal. -- Clive
From: brassplyer on 1 Aug 2010 06:03 On Jul 30, 8:29 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > If you're here illegally, and whelp a pup, it's an American Citizen. > > I guess with all of the latest negative press and pressure from > Conservative, Lindsey Graham thinks he$B!G(Bs figured out a nice bone to > throw for appeasement. Now, all of a sudden, he$B!G(Bs very irritated by all > of these anchor babies born here in America and he says: > > $B!H(BI may introduce a constitutional amendment that changes the rules > if you have a child here,$B!I(B This is so stupid simple obvious and long overdue, the only logical conclusion that it hasn't happened already is because those of the "Star Chamber" don't want it to happen to facilitate whatever their master plan is. The only people in favor of the anchor baby bullshit are those with ties to illegals or liberal whiners.
From: edspyhill01 on 1 Aug 2010 11:33 On Jul 30, 8:29 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > If you're here illegally, and whelp a pup, it's an American Citizen. > > I guess with all of the latest negative press and pressure from > Conservative, Lindsey Graham thinks he$B!G(Bs figured out a nice bone to > throw for appeasement. Now, all of a sudden, he$B!G(Bs very irritated by all > of these anchor babies born here in America and he says: > > $B!H(BI may introduce a constitutional amendment that changes the rules > if you have a child here,$B!I(B Graham said during an interview with Fox > News$B!G(B Greta Van Susteren. $B!H(BBirthright citizenship I think is a > mistake, that we should change our Constitution and say if you come > here illegally and you have a child, that child$B!G(Bs automatically not > a citizen.$B!I(B Asked how intent Graham is on introducing the amendment, > the South Carolina Republican responded: $B!H(BI got to.$B!I(B $B!H(BPeople > come here to have babies,$B!I(B he said. $B!H(BThey come here to drop a > child. It$B!G(Bs called $B!H(Bdrop and leave.$B!I(B To have a child in America, > they cross the border, they go to the emergency room, have a child, > and that child$B!G(Bs automatically an American citizen. That shouldn$B!G(Bt > be the case. That attracts people here for all the wrong reasons.$B!I(B > > Also up for consideration are "Birth Tours", where women ready to pop come > here, have a "US Citizen", then go home. On the surface, this really isn't > bad, since when the baby comes of age he can choose whether to stay where > he is, or claim his US birthright and "come home". > > However, some are using this as a hedge against economic downturns in > their own countries, and then coming back with their "US citizen". NOBODY will introduce a constitutional amendment to change that law. I also think nobody will chance opening the constitutional ammendment process for fear of what will happen. The first thing the loons will do is declare America a Christian nation and Christianity as the state religion. Why don't we all take 24 hours away from any media and rethink a few things through.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 1 Aug 2010 11:42 On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 08:33:20 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > On Jul 30, 8:29 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >> If you're here illegally, and whelp a pup, it's an American Citizen. >> >> I guess with all of the latest negative press and pressure from >> Conservative, Lindsey Graham thinks he's figured out a nice bone to >> throw for appeasement. Now, all of a sudden, he's very irritated by all >> of these anchor babies born here in America and he says: >> >> “I may introduce a constitutional amendment that changes the rules >> if you have a child here,” Graham said during an interview with Fox >> News' Greta Van Susteren. “Birthright citizenship I think is a >> mistake, that we should change our Constitution and say if you come >> here illegally and you have a child, that child's automatically not >> a citizen.” Asked how intent Graham is on introducing the amendment, >> the South Carolina Republican responded: “I got to.” “People >> come here to have babies,” he said. “They come here to drop a >> child. It's called “drop and leave.” To have a child in America, >> they cross the border, they go to the emergency room, have a child, >> and that child's automatically an American citizen. That shouldn't >> be the case. That attracts people here for all the wrong reasons.” >> >> Also up for consideration are "Birth Tours", where women ready to pop come >> here, have a "US Citizen", then go home. On the surface, this really isn't >> bad, since when the baby comes of age he can choose whether to stay where >> he is, or claim his US birthright and "come home". >> >> However, some are using this as a hedge against economic downturns in >> their own countries, and then coming back with their "US citizen". > > NOBODY will introduce a constitutional amendment to change that law. > I also think nobody will chance opening the constitutional ammendment > process for fear of what will happen. The first thing the loons will > do is declare America a Christian nation and Christianity as the state > religion. No, the first thing that will happen is the Democrats will declare all illegal immigrants citizens and give them voting rights. 12M new Democrat voters with the stroke of a pen! Insurance of future Democrat wins. That's all they want. They don't care about the poor 'brown people', they want the votes. If they were a corporation they would be after themselves for corrupt practices. > > Why don't we all take 24 hours away from any media and rethink a few > things through.
From: edspyhill01 on 1 Aug 2010 12:07
On Aug 1, 11:42 am, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 08:33:20 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > > On Jul 30, 8:29 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >> If you're here illegally, and whelp a pup, it's an American Citizen. > > >> I guess with all of the latest negative press and pressure from > >> Conservative, Lindsey Graham thinks he$B!G(Bs figured out a nice bone to > >> throw for appeasement. Now, all of a sudden, he$B!G(Bs very irritated by all > >> of these anchor babies born here in America and he says: > > >> $B!H(BI may introduce a constitutional amendment that changes the rules > >> if you have a child here,$B!I(B Graham said during an interview with Fox > >> News$B!G(B Greta Van Susteren. $B!H(BBirthright citizenship I think is a > >> mistake, that we should change our Constitution and say if you come > >> here illegally and you have a child, that child$B!G(Bs automatically not > >> a citizen.$B!I(B Asked how intent Graham is on introducing the amendment, > >> the South Carolina Republican responded: $B!H(BI got to.$B!I(B $B!H(BPeople > >> come here to have babies,$B!I(B he said. $B!H(BThey come here to drop a > >> child. It$B!G(Bs called $B!H(Bdrop and leave.$B!I(B To have a child in America, > >> they cross the border, they go to the emergency room, have a child, > >> and that child$B!G(Bs automatically an American citizen. That shouldn$B!G(Bt > >> be the case. That attracts people here for all the wrong reasons.$B!I(B > > >> Also up for consideration are "Birth Tours", where women ready to pop come > >> here, have a "US Citizen", then go home. On the surface, this really isn't > >> bad, since when the baby comes of age he can choose whether to stay where > >> he is, or claim his US birthright and "come home". > > >> However, some are using this as a hedge against economic downturns in > >> their own countries, and then coming back with their "US citizen". > > > NOBODY will introduce a constitutional amendment to change that law. > > I also think nobody will chance opening the constitutional ammendment > > process for fear of what will happen. The first thing the loons will > > do is declare America a Christian nation and Christianity as the state > > religion. > > No, the first thing that will happen is the Democrats will declare all > illegal immigrants citizens and give them voting rights. 12M new Democrat > voters with the stroke of a pen! Insurance of future Democrat wins. > > That's all they want. They don't care about the poor 'brown people', they > want the votes. If they were a corporation they would be after themselves > for corrupt practices. > > > > > > > Why don't we all take 24 hours away from any media and rethink a few > > things through.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Stop it, you sound like chicken little. You think democrats vote in lock-step like the republicans. We don't. |