{BS} Movement afoot to drop "anchor babies"
in [Toyota]
|
From: pandora on 3 Aug 2010 23:33 On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:49:25 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:18:00 -0500, pandora wrote: > >> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:56:19 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:54:05 -0500, pandora wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:58:23 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:33:51 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, >>>>> pandora <pandora(a)peak.org> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>> >>>>>>It is certainly beginning to look that way. What is it about these >>>>>>idiots that makes them HATE the US and all that it stands for? They >>>>>>aren't ONLY interested in getting their own but doing their best to >>>>>>keep everyone else from getting anything at all. >>>>> >>>>> Nutshell, the middle class is disappearing and tey feel threatened. >>>>> It is not that the poor or less fortunate are rising to their level >>>>> so much as they are dropping the the lower rungs of the economic >>>>> ladder. What they see as their historical perogative is being >>>>> stripped away. >>>> >>>> That is a distinct possibility. So, it's really all a class struggle >>>> with a touch of racism thrown in for good measure? >>>> >>>>> The sad thing is the people they support are the people who have >>>>> done the most damage to the middle class in the USA to favor their >>>>> rich contributors. >>>> >>>> Absolutely agreed! >>> >>> And yet, I bet you think $11,000 for a wedding cake and a wedding that >>> cost $12,000 per guest is OK. >>> >>> Feh. >> >> Ahhh, poor little wingnut. Didn't get invited to the wedding. They >> must have lost your invitation. Hey, at least they were spending their >> money and stimulating the economy, eh? > > > Yeah. Sure. You ARE jealous. Hehehehehe. By the way, I was at a wedding on that very same day. Didn't cost anywhere near what the *other* one did. It was a middle class wedding but they still spent some of their money on it. So did I. The hotel staff and restaurant staff didn't seem to mind.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 3 Aug 2010 23:33 On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:49:50 -0500, pandora wrote: > On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 19:01:18 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:32:30 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, pandora >> <pandora(a)peak.org> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:59:57 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:58:48 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Who said they were not, Strawboy? Do try to keep up with the big >>>>> kids. You were whining about your paranoid delusion that the >>>>> democrats were going to legalize all the illegal immigrants just to >>>>> have more voters. You were laughed at for being a paranoid fucktube >>>>> and then you started snipping-n-running. >>>> >>>> >>>> Prove that is not what's going to happen (pr, more to the point, what >>>> they are going to try to do?) >>> >>>Ah, more of the hallucinations of Hachoo that he believes are reality. >>>Poor thing. >> >> More to the point, he demands his delusions be proven wrong. > > Indeed. He dreams em up and then others are supposed to prove they > aren't gonna happen. Fey! What a Brain Trust you two are. "Think outside the box? What box?" Wow. Absolutely incredible. > >> Note: he didn't argue their essential delusional nature. > > Probably because he believes that really IS what's going to happen. That Obungler is going to grant amnesty and have 12M new Democrats? Yup. Only dumbasses can't see that agenda.
From: pandora on 3 Aug 2010 23:35 On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:52:17 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:32:30 -0500, pandora wrote: > >> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:59:57 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:58:48 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Who said they were not, Strawboy? Do try to keep up with the big >>>> kids. You were whining about your paranoid delusion that the >>>> democrats were going to legalize all the illegal immigrants just to >>>> have more voters. You were laughed at for being a paranoid fucktube >>>> and then you started snipping-n-running. >>> >>> >>> Prove that is not what's going to happen (pr, more to the point, what >>> they are going to try to do?) >> >> Ah, more of the hallucinations of Hachoo that he believes are reality. >> Poor thing. > > I should know better than to ask people whou couldn't think their way > out of a wet sock to try to imagine a potential outcome. At least I don't go around imagining scenarios and then tossing them out as reality. You should have that looked at. > Sorry, won't ask questions anymore that require an answer more difficult > than "MEEEEE TOOOO!" > Am I supposed to feel insulted? > > >> >>> The fact of the matter is, Obungler has made such a mess of things >>> Democrats are running from him rather than trying to seek endorsements >>> (NBC Nightly News, tonight). So in order to maintain power, they will >>> do whatever is required to maintain the voter base. What better way >>> than to grant 12M people Legal Residence status, and then Fast Track >>> them to citizenship, give them free health care and access to Welfare. >>> >>> Only a real idiot wouldn't be able to see... >>> >>> >>> never mind... >>> So, I guess when the shrub allowed that many illegals to accumulate he was up to something to get more voters for himself?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 3 Aug 2010 23:45 On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:33:12 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>> And yet, I bet you think $11,000 for a wedding cake and a wedding that >>>> cost $12,000 per guest is OK. >>>> >>>> Feh. >>> >>> Ahhh, poor little wingnut. Didn't get invited to the wedding. They >>> must have lost your invitation. Hey, at least they were spending their >>> money and stimulating the economy, eh? >> >> >> Yeah. Sure. > > You ARE jealous. You ARE nuts.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 3 Aug 2010 23:49
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:35:53 -0500, pandora wrote: > On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:52:17 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > >> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:32:30 -0500, pandora wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:59:57 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:58:48 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Who said they were not, Strawboy? Do try to keep up with the big >>>>> kids. You were whining about your paranoid delusion that the >>>>> democrats were going to legalize all the illegal immigrants just to >>>>> have more voters. You were laughed at for being a paranoid fucktube >>>>> and then you started snipping-n-running. >>>> >>>> >>>> Prove that is not what's going to happen (pr, more to the point, what >>>> they are going to try to do?) >>> >>> Ah, more of the hallucinations of Hachoo that he believes are reality. >>> Poor thing. >> >> I should know better than to ask people whou couldn't think their way >> out of a wet sock to try to imagine a potential outcome. > > At least I don't go around imagining scenarios and then tossing them out > as reality. You should have that looked at. Prove they can't be. > >> Sorry, won't ask questions anymore that require an answer more difficult >> than "MEEEEE TOOOO!" >> > Am I supposed to feel insulted? Being a wannabe? Hey, if you're good with that, go for it. >> >> >>> >>>> The fact of the matter is, Obungler has made such a mess of things >>>> Democrats are running from him rather than trying to seek endorsements >>>> (NBC Nightly News, tonight). So in order to maintain power, they will >>>> do whatever is required to maintain the voter base. What better way >>>> than to grant 12M people Legal Residence status, and then Fast Track >>>> them to citizenship, give them free health care and access to Welfare. >>>> >>>> Only a real idiot wouldn't be able to see... >>>> >>>> >>>> never mind... >>>> > > So, I guess when the shrub allowed that many illegals to accumulate he > was up to something to get more voters for himself? How little you pay attention. Do you remember the "Guest Worker" plan? You know, the one ignored by Congress? |