Prev: {BS} Hachi, see the fox on Fox
Next: Squeaking noise when starting 2007 Corolla CE manual 5 SPD
From: Jeff Strickland on 13 Sep 2009 15:49

"ByTor" <ByTor(a)snowdog.com> wrote in message
news:00661193$0$30038$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...
> In article <pan.2009.09.13.01.07.14.281772(a)e86.GTS>, Trueno(a)e86.GTS
> says...
>
>> Latest snear campaign by our compassionate Liberal friends is that Beck
>> raped and murdered a girl in 1900. It's already been debunked, primarily
>> because some people are showing his "mug shot" while others are saying
>> there wasn't enough evidence to arrest him.
>>
>> Just another example that your friendly compassionate Liberal will be
>> reduced to a snarling mass if disagreed with...
>
> Just like Nancy Pelosi insisting now that Joe Wilson "furthur" apologize
> even after Obama accepted the apology. I mean furthur embarassment to
> him could possibly uproot a republican seat right?
>
> http://thehill.com/homenews/house/58331-dems-lay-plans-to-scold-wilson
>
> "Speaker Nancy Pelosi has agreed the House should vote next week on
> scolding Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.) for his outburst during President
> Barack Obama's speech unless he apologies on the floor of the House."
>
> I hope the next time "anyone" in congress starts booing, hissing &
> yelling "untrue" during addresses gets the same treatment & the long
> drawn out covered stories on the news.
>

The problem for Pelosi is that Wilson appears by all indications to have
been correct, there is no mechanism to prevent illegal immigrants from
collecting either the subsidies for buying coverage, or getting coverage as
an indigent. Obama stated emphatically that illegals would not be covered,
but the facts are that there is no language to prevent them from getting
coverage. Republicans have given a few amendments to prevent coverage of
illegals, but the Dems have voted them down. It is a huge issue, and
therefore Wilson's assertion is more true than false.

Perhaps a bit rude, but true just the same.








From: Jeff Strickland on 13 Sep 2009 16:07

"SMS" <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> wrote in message
news:4aad1075$0$1593$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
> ByTor wrote:
>
>> So its obvious that the opposition labels him a loon, and he just might
>> be, but honestly here, you don't think there is anything he says that may
>> have some merit, I mean absolutely nothing?
>
> There might be, but since he's been proven to be a pathological liar
> you'll never know when he's saying something with merit.
>


Proven by whom?








From: ByTor on 13 Sep 2009 19:35
In article <4aad4f61$0$1588$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>,
scharf.steven(a)geemail.com says...
>
> ByTor wrote:
>
> > So because I say I know nothing about this you imply that I'm (and
> > others)are ignorant in some way?
>
> Yes, that's what I'm implying.

(LMAO).....Okay, thanks for sharing!
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 14 Sep 2009 00:15
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:33:24 -0700, SMS wrote:

> ByTor wrote:
>
>> So its obvious that the opposition labels him a loon, and he just might
>> be, but honestly here, you don't think there is anything he says that
>> may have some merit, I mean absolutely nothing?
>
> There might be, but since he's been proven to be a pathological liar
> you'll never know when he's saying something with merit.

Then why did he win the election?



From: SMS on 15 Sep 2009 11:58
edspyhill01 wrote:

> But why doesn't Beck just deny the charges? Why is he withholding his
> explanation? If he has an alibi, why doesn't he produce it?

And at the same time he can provide a copy of his birth certificate.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: {BS} Hachi, see the fox on Fox
Next: Squeaking noise when starting 2007 Corolla CE manual 5 SPD