From: edspyhill01 on
On Sep 25, 9:47 am, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
> >"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:xn0gfkivv1o0ae006(a)reader.albasani.net...
> >>JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>
> >>>If you were the president, exactly what would YOU do about Iran's
> >>>nuclear issue RIGHT NOW?
>
> >>Stop with the interrogations and state YOUR OWN opinions.
>
> >Why is it that you boys are ALWAYS afraid to answer questions in the
> >order they were asked? You boys ALWAYS want someone else's thoughts
> >before you can struggle to express your own.
>
> >If you were the president, exactly what would YOU do about Iran's
> >nuclear issue RIGHT NOW?
>
> I would send you there to talk them into giving up and acting nice.
>
Give us a demonstration. Go over there and show us up.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on
"Hachiroku" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.09.25.15.34.20.391000(a)e86.GTS...


Your subject line by itself is rather interesting. Sounds like you're
announcing this as some sort of "new news". Hopefully that's not the case,
since the Iranian government published lots of photos of their nut job
president touring a facility several months ago.


From: SMS on
edspyhill01 wrote:
> On Sep 25, 8:28 am, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:19:59 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote:
>>> On Sep 25, 11:34 am, Hachiroku <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>>>> Let's see if we can get them to peace out! Sanctions coming soon.
>>>> Obama getting tough?!?!?!
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILHLyw02sOs
>>> Dude, you are in the diplomatic loop. You couldn't mediate a fight
>>> between two girl scouts.
>> This is Obama's chance to put his foot down.
>> Bet he backs down instead.
>
> And why is it OUR responsibility to sacrifice our citizens' lives and
> our treasury by doing something? I would think Iran's neighbors would
> be much more concerned. America is not the "toughest dad" in the
> universe.

I don't think we want Iran's most concerned neighbor acting unilaterally
in the is case.

Whatever is done now needs to be done by a coalition of countries, not
just the U.S. and not just Israel going in and removing the threat
(which they will do if no one else does, but it would likely start a war
involving several other middle eastern countries). One advantage in Iran
is that you'd have widespread support from most Iranians if a coalition
went in and supported regime change in a way that did not destroy the
country in the process.

Obama must be a very good poker player. He played his hand on this
latest crisis very shrewdly, lining up Russia and China before even
disclosing the problem. You can just imagine how W's administration
would have screwed it up.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on
"SMS" <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> wrote in message
news:4abe132a$0$1673$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
> edspyhill01 wrote:
>> On Sep 25, 8:28 am, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:19:59 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote:
>>>> On Sep 25, 11:34 am, Hachiroku <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>>>>> Let's see if we can get them to peace out! Sanctions coming soon.
>>>>> Obama getting tough?!?!?!
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILHLyw02sOs
>>>> Dude, you are in the diplomatic loop. You couldn't mediate a fight
>>>> between two girl scouts.
>>> This is Obama's chance to put his foot down.
>>> Bet he backs down instead.
>>
>> And why is it OUR responsibility to sacrifice our citizens' lives and
>> our treasury by doing something? I would think Iran's neighbors would
>> be much more concerned. America is not the "toughest dad" in the
>> universe.
>
> I don't think we want Iran's most concerned neighbor acting unilaterally
> in the is case.
>
> Whatever is done now needs to be done by a coalition of countries, not
> just the U.S. and not just Israel going in and removing the threat
> (which they will do if no one else does, but it would likely start a war
> involving several other middle eastern countries). One advantage in Iran
> is that you'd have widespread support from most Iranians if a coalition
> went in and supported regime change in a way that did not destroy the
> country in the process.
>
> Obama must be a very good poker player. He played his hand on this
> latest crisis very shrewdly, lining up Russia and China before even
> disclosing the problem. You can just imagine how W's administration
> would have screwed it up.


But the droolers CRAVE what GWB would be doing right now: Spewing bar talk
like a cowboy in a bad movie.


From: ByTor on
In article <e500f6e0-2490-43ac-a710-388e35e9aeb5
@f33g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>, edspyhill01(a)gmail.com says...
>
> On Sep 25, 9:30 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstr...(a)frontiernet.net>
> wrote:
> > "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
> > news:xn0gfkivv1o0ae006(a)reader.albasani.net...
> >
> > > JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
> >
> > >>If you were the president, exactly what would YOU do about Iran's
> > >>nuclear issue RIGHT NOW?
> >
> > > Stop with the interrogations and state YOUR OWN opinions.
> >
> > Why is it that you boys are ALWAYS afraid to answer questions in the order
> > they were asked? You boys ALWAYS want someone else's thoughts before you can
> > struggle to express your own.
> >
> > If you were the president, exactly what would YOU do about Iran's nuclear
> > issue RIGHT NOW?
>
> They have no answers. They will have nothing new to say until next
> week. All their their rightwingnut radio talk show hosts are off for
> the weekend.

I haven't seen you offer any of your own suggestions.