From: FatterDumber& Happier Moe on
Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:44:06 -0600, FatterDumber& Happier Moe wrote:
>
>> Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
>>> "I don't want funded abortions"
>>> "I want a public option"
>>> "I want funded abortions"
>>> "I don't want a public option"
>>>
>>> And McCain agrees with Dean...
>>> Try to find that in the "News".
>>>
>>> I know! Why don't they just pass "Something" like the House did, and
>>> then they can hammer out the details later?
>>>
>>> If the Republicans did something that plain fu(a)king STOOPID the
>>> "Mainstream Media" would be all over them.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> The health care system is going to bankrupt the US one way or the
>> other eventually. Abortions? I never understood why Republicans are
>> against it, don't they know where all the little Democrats are coming
>> from?
>
>
> You have a point there...
>
> Many years ago, in the BBS days, I had an online friend, Patrick Henry.
> Great-great-grandson of the original. I was against publicly funded
> abortions, and he called me one night and said, "Ya know, and abortion
> costs $2400. Welfare for one of these bastards costs about $1M. Pay for
> the abortion!"
>
> It's not so much abortion, it's the misuse the system is gong to get, but
> even more than that, the Liberal radical buzzord for abortion is, "...this
> health care."
>
> It's not 'health care".
>
I think more abortions might be good for the health of the nation. I
must be a conservative today. I'm thinking of how much output it takes
from productive people to feed, house and take care of the welfare
class. I think there are only two people left actually working in the
neigborhood now. Those that do work don't actually work, they are
service sector people. This country is going to have to start building
it's own toys if it's going to continue to exist.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:16:57 -0600, FatterDumber& Happier Moe wrote:

> This country is going to have to start building it's own toys if
> it's going to continue to exist.

Preferrably without lead paint...



From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:39:15 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
> news:pan.2009.12.18.00.33.45.286065(a)e86.GTS...
>> "I don't want funded abortions"
>> "I want a public option"
>> "I want funded abortions"
>> "I don't want a public option"
>>
>> And McCain agrees with Dean...
>> Try to find that in the "News".
>>
>> I know! Why don't they just pass "Something" like the House did, and
>> then they can hammer out the details later?
>>
>> If the Republicans did something that plain fu(a)king STOOPID the
>> "Mainstream Media" would be all over them.
>
>
> We vote for them because they DON'T all think alike, scooter. Get it?

<YAWN>

Two Democrats show some initiative and actually think for themselves, and
all of a sudden no two think alike.

How about over at the House, where "we'll sign something now and actually
come up with it later"?


From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:56:37 -0800, Jeff Strickland wrote:

>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> news:RaAWm.196$ft1.182(a)newsfe10.iad...
>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>> news:pan.2009.12.18.00.33.45.286065(a)e86.GTS...
>>> "I don't want funded abortions"
>>> "I want a public option"
>>> "I want funded abortions"
>>> "I don't want a public option"
>>>
>>> And McCain agrees with Dean...
>>> Try to find that in the "News".
>>>
>>> I know! Why don't they just pass "Something" like the House did, and
>>> then they can hammer out the details later?
>>>
>>> If the Republicans did something that plain fu(a)king STOOPID the
>>> "Mainstream Media" would be all over them.
>>
>>
>> We vote for them because they DON'T all think alike, scooter. Get it?
>>
>> Of course you don't, you walking bag of detritus.
>>
>>
> Given the reality of the debate, that doesn't even make sense.
>
> I'm positive you have no clue what happened yesterday in the senate.

The TIMES is waiting to see if they'll kiss and make up before printing
the story.



From: edspyhill01 on
On Dec 17, 7:33 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
> "I don't want funded abortions"
> "I want a public option"
> "I want funded abortions"
> "I don't want a public option"
>
> And McCain agrees with Dean...
> Try to find that in the "News".
>
> I know! Why don't they just pass "Something" like the House did, and then
> they can hammer out the details later?
>
> If the Republicans did something that plain fu(a)king STOOPID the
> "Mainstream Media" would be all over them.

Bluedog Democrats and conserva-dems and dix-crats are not progressive
democrats. This is our version of the right's Goldwater republican,
Reagan republican, fundamentalist conservatives, neo-conservative
battles. Try leaning more toward an anthropological view, maybe a
historian's view of the current turmoil in our country.