{BS} Al Gore gets a car loan
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: KINDLY ADD CANCER CURE TO CONSPIRACIES 101
Next: Groaning Noise from front end starting at 10MPH....
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 28 Sep 2009 20:45 On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:11:12 -0700, Jeffutz wrote: > On Sep 28, 9:46 am, Tegger <inva...(a)invalid.inv> wrote: >> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstr...(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in news:r43wm.445253 >> $Ta5.383...(a)newsfe15.iad: >> >> > "Hachiroku" <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> >news:pan.2009.09.28.17.39.42.796000(a)e86.GTS... >> >> $500M >> >> >> For a hybrid. >> >> To be built in Finland. >> >> That will probably not be sold in the US. >> >> >> Way to go, Al! Push your agenda all over the world, using *OUR* >> >> money! >> >> > Source. Now. >> >> The Wall Street Journal, for one. >> <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125383160812639013.html> >> >> -- >> Tegger > > While I am totally for improved fuel efficiency, I have to wonder why > we're (i.e., the US gov't) is loaning money to a car company for work done > is Sweden. I could see loaning a foreign company money for work done in > the US, but not when the work is done overseas, unless there is a valid > reason why the work could not be done here (e.g., specific technology that > is based only in Sweden). > > Jeff I think it's Finland, and it's because it's a hybrid that gets (supposedly) 100 MPG. But, it still uses gas. And it's because It's Save the Planet Al. That's enough to satisfy anyone.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 28 Sep 2009 22:16 "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:h9rq6u$uis$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> >>> Obama is so out of his mind that he bounces around like a monkey f---ing >>> a football. Wait, that's YOU. I need another metaphor for the antics of >>> The Bamster. >> >> >> Did you read anything about this story, or are you just reacting to what >> you've seen about it here in this newsgroup? >> > > > IF I'm reacting to anything, it's you. You said there was a 95% chance > that the assertion was wrong -- AL GORE GETS A LOAN. Actually, no. I did not say that.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 28 Sep 2009 22:57 On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:49:03 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>> As of 9:46 AM, you and I both had access to the exact same WSJ story >>> which >>> Tegger was kind enough to provide a link for. At 9:53 AM, he corrected >>> a statement you made in your original post. Go read the story Tegger >>> provided and you'll see your mistake. >> >> At 9:46 I was out the door and on my way to work. > > > That WSJ story is the only one we've both read, therefore it is the only > one on which further discussion can be based. You're the moderator now? KMA, SFB.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 28 Sep 2009 23:00 "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:pan.2009.09.29.02.57.20.387016(a)e86.GTS... > On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:49:03 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > >>>> As of 9:46 AM, you and I both had access to the exact same WSJ story >>>> which >>>> Tegger was kind enough to provide a link for. At 9:53 AM, he corrected >>>> a statement you made in your original post. Go read the story Tegger >>>> provided and you'll see your mistake. >>> >>> At 9:46 I was out the door and on my way to work. >> >> >> That WSJ story is the only one we've both read, therefore it is the only >> one on which further discussion can be based. > > You're the moderator now? Of course not. It's just logic. We can't discuss a news story if only one of us has read it. > KMA, SFB. Uh oh. Abbreviations. Do they make you feel special?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 28 Sep 2009 23:37
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:00:34 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:pan.2009.09.29.02.57.20.387016(a)e86.GTS... >> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:49:03 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> >>>>> As of 9:46 AM, you and I both had access to the exact same WSJ story >>>>> which >>>>> Tegger was kind enough to provide a link for. At 9:53 AM, he >>>>> corrected a statement you made in your original post. Go read the >>>>> story Tegger provided and you'll see your mistake. >>>> >>>> At 9:46 I was out the door and on my way to work. >>> >>> >>> That WSJ story is the only one we've both read, therefore it is the >>> only one on which further discussion can be based. >> >> You're the moderator now? > > Of course not. It's just logic. We can't discuss a news story if only one > of us has read it. > Gore got a loan, for a Finnish company to build a car the US may never see. What more do you need to know? > > >> KMA, SFB. > > Uh oh. Abbreviations. Do they make you feel special? Sorry, I forgot you're 'challenged'. Try Google, and you might find out what they mean. |