From: Built_Well on

C. E. White wrote:

> I like the OE Toyota filters (made in Japan, P/N 90915-10004) and
> would keep using them if I can find them. I am not impressed with the
> Toyota replacement style filters (made in Thailand, P/N 90915-YZZF1).
> I prefer the Purolater PL14477 Filter over the 90915-YZZF1 Filter.
========

Thank you very much for the info, Ed. Do you happen to have a link to
that SAE research paper written by Barris about air filters? It's
$14 at SAE.org, the price of an Amsoil filter ;-)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

From: Ed White on

"Built_Well" <built_well_toyota(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.10.03.12.44.29.107134(a)hotmail.com...
>
> C. E. White wrote:
>
>> I like the OE Toyota filters (made in Japan, P/N 90915-10004) and
>> would keep using them if I can find them. I am not impressed with the
>> Toyota replacement style filters (made in Thailand, P/N 90915-YZZF1).
>> I prefer the Purolater PL14477 Filter over the 90915-YZZF1 Filter.
> ========
>
> Thank you very much for the info, Ed. Do you happen to have a link to
> that SAE research paper written by Barris about air filters? It's
> $14 at SAE.org, the price of an Amsoil filter ;-)

SAE does a very good job of securing it's papers these days. It used to be
that you could purchase a pdf copy and share it. How they have added extra
security that prevents copies from opening on other computers. I've never
downloaded that particular paper. I've only read the extracts quoted in
other papers. You might find a freely available SAE paper from Visteon
interesting. See http://www.visteon.com/utils/whitepapers/2005_01_1139.pdf .
It discusses factors that contribute to air filter life.

Ed


From: Retired VIP on
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 08:18:37 -0400, "C. E. White"
<cewhite3(a)removemindspring.com> wrote:

>
>"Built_Well" <built_well_toyota(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4702be07$0$26469$88260bb3(a)free.teranews.com...
>>
>> C. E. White wrote:
>> > Thailand made Denso filters.
>> ========
>>
>> Most of the parts under my 'yota's hood have
>> Denso on them. Denso must have some American
>> factories, too, because I stopped by the dealership
>> today to get a look at the OEM air filter they sell. The
>> packaging had Toyota on it and the air filter had
>> "Denso" written on it and "Made in the U.S.A."
>
>Toyota owns a big chunk (23% or so) of Nippondenso (aka Denso)
>directly, and indirectly owns more through other companies it
>controls. Roughly 50% of Denso's sales are to Toyota. Honda is Denso's
>second largest Customer, but at 7.5% of Denso's volume, they are not
>exactly a major Customer.
>
>Denso has quite a few manufacturing plants in the US (and more in
>Canada and Mexico). Air and oil filters are manufactured at a plant in
>Tennessee plant owned by a joint venture between Denso and Toyota
>Boshoku (another Toyota affiliate) The company is TBDN Tennessee
>Company. It manufactures air cleaners and oil filters. See -
>http://www.tbdn.com/products.shtml . The oil filters I have bought for
>my SO's RAV4 are labeled either made in Japan (the good ones) or made
>in Thailand (the less good ones).

Denso may own manufacturing plants in the US but they may also
contract out to other manufacturers in the US. For instance,
Interstate Batteries are made by Johnson Controls as are quite a few
of the domestic OEM batteries. Exide is another company that
manufactures batteries that are re-branded. Both companies make
quality products.

Just because the oil filter is made in Thailand or Tennessee doesn't
mean it's inferior to ones made in Japan.

Jack


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 000778-2, 10/03/2007
Tested on: 10/3/2007 8:49:29 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com



From: Ed White on

"Retired VIP" <Jackj14321(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:i1d8g319id8hl7fuh9h2cbb00e59lcjeei(a)4ax.com...

> Just because the oil filter is made in Thailand or Tennessee doesn't
> mean it's inferior to ones made in Japan.

I didn't mean to imply that this was the case. Go to my page showing the
insides of the two filters mentioned and decide for yourself which you
prefer. See http://home.earthlink.net/~cewhite3nc/id12.html .

Ed


From: Retired VIP on
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 20:59:59 -0400, "Ed White"
<cewhite3(a)mindspring.com> wrote:

>
>"Retired VIP" <Jackj14321(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:i1d8g319id8hl7fuh9h2cbb00e59lcjeei(a)4ax.com...
>
>> Just because the oil filter is made in Thailand or Tennessee doesn't
>> mean it's inferior to ones made in Japan.
>
>I didn't mean to imply that this was the case. Go to my page showing the
>insides of the two filters mentioned and decide for yourself which you
>prefer. See http://home.earthlink.net/~cewhite3nc/id12.html .
>
>Ed
>

Hi Ed,

Thanks for the link, you've done some work there. But I fail to see
what there is about any of the filters that you don't like. You admit
that you have no scientific test results on any of the filters. I
think it would be impossible to judge filter material efficiency by
appearance alone. I'm not saying that you are wrong, just that I
don't see anything from the pictures that would make me choose one
over the other.

Jack


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 000778-3, 10/04/2007
Tested on: 10/4/2007 9:06:57 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com



First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Bush - dumb as a fox
Next: mobile 1