From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 08:01:26 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

> "Hachiroku" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
> news:pan.2009.09.04.15.44.16.94000(a)e86.GTS...
>> On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:23:50 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> There was absolutely NO ONE on the road between me and the truck.
>>>>
>>>> Don't read well, do you?
>>>
>>>
>>> There's nobody on the road until suddenly, there is.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, right. With 2+ miles visibility, no one in front of me, and a few
>> cars behind me. I suppose the Men In Black were going to airlift a van
>> full of church children in my path.
>>
>> Keep hitting the crack pipe. It does wonders for you.
>>
>> I don't play like that on a busy highway. But then, I have a brain. Twit.
>
> Considering your past, it's highly likely that you're lying.

Considering your past, it's likely you just can't get a grasp on reality.



From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:02:22 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

>>> There's nobody on the road until suddenly, there is.
>>>
>>
>>
>> DISCUSSION
>> The sky is blue
>>
>> JOE
>> I rode on a blue airplane once ...
>
>
> If you think my "nobody on the road" comment was irrelevant, you're stupider
> than I previously thought.

On an Interstate highway, there's almost always somebody on the road.

The only way somebody could have gotten in front of me was if they
*passed* me, which meant they had to be going faster than 115, or they
came across the 100 ft median.



From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 12:54:00 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:h7rghq$fkp$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>> news:Q6aom.170484$Qg6.160862(a)newsfe14.iad...
>>>>
>>>> If you think it IS relevent, then you're stupider than I thought.
>>>>
>>>> Wait, that's not possible. Never mind.
>>>
>>>
>>> OK - I just described how auto accidents happen, and you think it's
>>> irrelevant. Explain why you think it's irrelevant.
>>>
>>
>> 1. As a general rule, there has to be other vehicles on the road.
>
>
> Yes. "on the road", or in the space you're about to occupy. One moment,
> nobody there. The next moment, somebody there.

On an interstate highway, with the next on-ramp 11 miles away, and no
other traffic in either lane?

Maybe it can happen in *your* world, but to sane and sober people, it
ain't happening.

Unless God dropped that church van full of kids in front of me.
Hey, it could happen.

http://blogs.vibe.com/inviteonly/Funny-BabySmokingWeed.jpg

>
> There's also the matter of mechanical failure, especially when maintenance
> is done by a half-wit like the Hack.


At least I know what a car and a wrench are. And this is my Scion. It only
has 27,000 miles on it.


From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:40:49 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:h7rhso$qlu$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>> news:DSbom.170494$Qg6.128336(a)newsfe14.iad...
>>>
>>>
>>> What about moving objects other than cars?
>>>
>>
>>
>> ???
>
>
> Can't think of any such objects?

Moose. Deer. Maybe a bear. We are talking Vermont here.

However, when I was 29 in Canada and took my Hachi up to 130, it was a
holiday weekend. But there were two other cars a bit in front of me,
clearing the path.

No balls.



From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:51:47 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote:

>> You can't think of any other moving objects which might obstruct the
>> movement of a car in dangerous ways?
>>
>> Nothing?
>>
>
> Why should I 1.) bother, 2.) care?
>
> You are changing the subject from, "Wait for winter and add 20 mph. Do the
> world (and your mother) a favor." to somebody might get hurt.

You caught him and spanked him and now it's time for subterfuge.