From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 4 Sep 2009 20:20 On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 08:01:26 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > "Hachiroku" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:pan.2009.09.04.15.44.16.94000(a)e86.GTS... >> On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:23:50 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> >>>> >>>> There was absolutely NO ONE on the road between me and the truck. >>>> >>>> Don't read well, do you? >>> >>> >>> There's nobody on the road until suddenly, there is. >> >> >> Yeah, right. With 2+ miles visibility, no one in front of me, and a few >> cars behind me. I suppose the Men In Black were going to airlift a van >> full of church children in my path. >> >> Keep hitting the crack pipe. It does wonders for you. >> >> I don't play like that on a busy highway. But then, I have a brain. Twit. > > Considering your past, it's highly likely that you're lying. Considering your past, it's likely you just can't get a grasp on reality.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 4 Sep 2009 20:22 On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:02:22 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>> There's nobody on the road until suddenly, there is. >>> >> >> >> DISCUSSION >> The sky is blue >> >> JOE >> I rode on a blue airplane once ... > > > If you think my "nobody on the road" comment was irrelevant, you're stupider > than I previously thought. On an Interstate highway, there's almost always somebody on the road. The only way somebody could have gotten in front of me was if they *passed* me, which meant they had to be going faster than 115, or they came across the 100 ft median.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 4 Sep 2009 20:30 On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 12:54:00 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:h7rghq$fkp$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >> news:Q6aom.170484$Qg6.160862(a)newsfe14.iad... >>>> >>>> If you think it IS relevent, then you're stupider than I thought. >>>> >>>> Wait, that's not possible. Never mind. >>> >>> >>> OK - I just described how auto accidents happen, and you think it's >>> irrelevant. Explain why you think it's irrelevant. >>> >> >> 1. As a general rule, there has to be other vehicles on the road. > > > Yes. "on the road", or in the space you're about to occupy. One moment, > nobody there. The next moment, somebody there. On an interstate highway, with the next on-ramp 11 miles away, and no other traffic in either lane? Maybe it can happen in *your* world, but to sane and sober people, it ain't happening. Unless God dropped that church van full of kids in front of me. Hey, it could happen. http://blogs.vibe.com/inviteonly/Funny-BabySmokingWeed.jpg > > There's also the matter of mechanical failure, especially when maintenance > is done by a half-wit like the Hack. At least I know what a car and a wrench are. And this is my Scion. It only has 27,000 miles on it.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 4 Sep 2009 20:34 On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:40:49 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:h7rhso$qlu$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >> news:DSbom.170494$Qg6.128336(a)newsfe14.iad... >>> >>> >>> What about moving objects other than cars? >>> >> >> >> ??? > > > Can't think of any such objects? Moose. Deer. Maybe a bear. We are talking Vermont here. However, when I was 29 in Canada and took my Hachi up to 130, it was a holiday weekend. But there were two other cars a bit in front of me, clearing the path. No balls.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 4 Sep 2009 20:35
On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:51:47 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: >> You can't think of any other moving objects which might obstruct the >> movement of a car in dangerous ways? >> >> Nothing? >> > > Why should I 1.) bother, 2.) care? > > You are changing the subject from, "Wait for winter and add 20 mph. Do the > world (and your mother) a favor." to somebody might get hurt. You caught him and spanked him and now it's time for subterfuge. |